Generative Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Rights: A Comparative Analysis of Copyright, Patents and Trade Secrets

Authors

  • Begaim Mukhitovna Kaibyldaeva Central Asian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AICA), IT-Park, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • Anna Vladimirovna Ubaydullaeva Tashkent State University of Law image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69971/tipr.4.3.2026.138

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, intellectual property, copyright, patent law, trade secrets, generative AI, comparative law, WIPO, AI governance, legaltech

Abstract

The unprecedented development of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has fundamentally transformed the global intellectual property (IP) landscape. Unlike previous technological innovations, modern large language models (LLMs) and multimodal AI systems are capable of autonomously generating literary works, software code, music, images, inventions and commercially valuable information that increasingly resemble products of human creativity. These developments challenge traditional concepts of authorship, inventorship, ownership and confidentiality, requiring legislators and courts to reconsider long-established legal doctrines. This article examines the evolving relationship between artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights through a comparative legal analysis of copyright, patent law and trade secret protection. Particular attention is devoted to the regulatory approaches adopted by the European Union, the United States, the United Kingdom, China, Japan and Singapore. The research evaluates recent legislative initiatives, judicial decisions and policy documents adopted between 2024 and 2026, including the implementation of the European Union AI Act, developments within the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the OECD and leading national intellectual property offices. The paper argues that contemporary intellectual property systems are experiencing a transition from human-centred protection towards hybrid governance models that increasingly recognize the role of AI-assisted creativity while preserving human responsibility. The article proposes a balanced regulatory framework that distinguishes between AI-generated and AI-assisted outputs, strengthens transparency obligations concerning training data, enhances protection of confidential business information and promotes international harmonization of intellectual property rules in the era of generative AI.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, Ryan. 2016. I Think, Therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law. Boston College Law Review 57: 1079–1126. https://lira.bc.edu/works/publication-article/gqr6x-4b187

Abbott, Ryan. 2020. The Reasonable Robot: Artificial Intelligence and the Law. Cambridge University Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3611370

WIPO Database of Intellectual Property WIPO Legislative Texts. 1979. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Ar-tistic Works (adopted 9 September 1886, as amended 28 September 1979). WIPO Database of Intellectual Property WIPO Legislative Texts: 1-29. https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2014-04/Berne_Convention_for_the_Protection_of_Literary_and_Artistic_Works_28.09.1979_0.pdf

Burk, Dan L. 2024. Owning E-Sports: Proprietary Rights in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. University of Pennsylvania Law Re-view: 1535-1578. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2386205

Legislation. 2016. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Legislation. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/contents

WIPO. 2016. Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the Protection of Undis-closed Know how and Business Information against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure, European Union. WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/legislation/details/16435

European Patent Office. 2026. Patenting Artificial Intelligence. European Patent Office. https://link.epo.org/elearning/summary_conference_artificial_intelligence_en.pdf

European Patent Office. 2021. Decision J 8/20 (Designation of Inventor/DABUS). European Patent Office. https://www.epo.org/en/boards-of-appeal/decisions/j200008eu1

Guadamuz, Andres. 2017. Do Androids Dream of Electric Copyright? Comparative Analysis of Originality in Artificial Intelli-gence-Generated Works. Intellectual Property Quarterly 2: 169–86. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2981304

Infocomm Media Development Authority. 2024. Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI. InfoComm Media Devel-opment Authorit. https://www.imda.gov.sg/resources/press-releases-factsheets-and-speeches/press-releases/2024/public-consult-model-ai-governance-framework-genai

Thomson Reuters Practical Law. 2009. Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening (Case C 5/08) EU:C:2009:465. Thomson Reuters Practical Law. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/D-011-4079?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true

Chui, Michael, Eric Hazan, and Roger Roberts et al. 2023. The Economic Potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier. McKinsey & Compa-ny.https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/mckinsey%20digital/our%20insights/the%20economic%20potential%20of%20generative%20ai%20the%20next%20productivity%20frontier/the-economic -potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier.pdf

OECD. 2026a. Digital Government Outlook 2026. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2026/06/digital-government-outlook_4585678e.html

OECD. 2026b. The OECD.AI Index. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2026/02/oecd-ai-observatory-index_8f5fa0f2.html

European Union. 2024. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act). European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng

Samsung Electronics. 2023. Internal Restrictions on the Use of Generative AI Following Confidential Data Leakage. Seoul: Samsung Electronics.

Samuelson, Pamela. 2024. Generative AI Meets Copyright. Science 381: 158-161. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adi0656

Stanford University. 2025. AI Index Report 2025. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: 1-457. https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2025-ai-index-report

Stanford University. 2026. AI Index Report 2026. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: 1-425. https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2026-ai-index-report

WIPO. 2023. Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks UKSC 49. WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/judgments/details/2784

BITLAW. 2023. Thaler v Perlmutter 687 F Supp 3d 140 (DDC 2023). BITLAW. https://www.bitlaw.com/source/cases/copyright/Thaler-Perlmutter-Dct.html

Court Listener. 2026. The New York Times Company v Microsoft Corporation and OpenAI Inc, No 1:23 cv 11195. Court Lis-tener. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68117049/the-new-york-times-company-v-microsoft-corporation/

United States Copyright Office. 2023. Copyright Registration Guidance: Works Containing Material Generated by Artificial Intelligence. U.S. Copyright Office. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/16/2023-05321/copyright-registration-guidance-works-containing-material-generated-by-artificial-intelligence

United States Copyright Office. 2025. Copyright and Artificial Intelligence: Part 2 – Copyrightability. U.S. Copyright Office: 1-52. https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intelligence-Part-2-Copyrightability-Report.pdf

Kim, Charles, Srilakshmi Kumar and Matthew Sked. 2024. Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions. United States Pa-tent and Trademark Office: 1-39. https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/inventorship-guidance-for-ai-assisted-inventions.pdf

Organization. 2024a. Generative Artificial Intelligence: Patent Landscape Report. Geneva: WIPO.

World Intellectual Property Organization. 2024b. Getting the Innovation Ecosystem Ready for Artificial Intelligence: An Intel-lectual Property Policy Toolkit. WIPO: 1-41. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-2003-en-getting-the-innovation-ecosystem-ready-for-ai.pdf

World Intellectual Property Organization. 2024c. WIPO Conversation on Intellectual Property and Frontier Technologies. WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/en/web/frontier-technologies/frontier_conversation

World Intellectual Property Organization. 2026. World Intellectual Property Report 2026: Technology on the Move. WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4833

Yanisky-Ravid, Shlomit, and Xiaoqiong Liu. 2018. When Artificial Intelligence Systems Produce Inventions: An Alternative Model for Patent Law at the 3A Era. Cardozo Law Review 39 (6): 2215–65. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2931828

Downloads

Published

04-08-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kaibyldaeva, Begaim Mukhitovna, and Anna Vladimirovna Ubaydullaeva. 2026. “Generative Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Rights: A Comparative Analysis of Copyright, Patents and Trade Secrets”. Trends in Intellectual Property Research 4 (3): 27-33. https://doi.org/10.69971/tipr.4.3.2026.138.