Generative AI, Copyright Law, and the Future of Creativity: A Call for International Reform

Authors

  • Aminesh Nayan Gogoi India International University of Legal Education and Research, Goa,India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69971/tipr.4.3.2026.136

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, copyright law, generative AI, fair use, fair dealing, intellectual property

Abstract

Current study examines whether the use of copyrighted works in training generative AI systems amounts to copyright infringement under existing legal frameworks. The challenge is not merely to fit AI within the existing contours of copyright law, but to rethink those contours in light of new technological realities. The goal should be to construct a legal framework that preserves the foundational objectives of copyright, encouraging creativity and protecting authors, while enabling the continued growth of transformative technologies. In this sense, the regulation of AI training represents not an endpoint, but an evolving legal frontier that will shape the future relationship between law, creativity, and innovation. Current research analyzes the applicability of doctrines such as fair use and fair dealing in the context of large-scale data scraping and machine learning processes. It explores challenges relating to transparency, attribution, and enforcement, given the opaque nature of AI training datasets. By engaging with emerging global legal developments, it assesses whether current copyright regimes are equipped to address AI-driven innovation, and argues for clearer standards to balance technological advancement with the protection of creators’ rights in the digital environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Aminesh Nayan Gogoi, India International University of Legal Education and Research, Goa,India

    Aminesh Nayan Gogoi is an advocate, a law graduate from the National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam, and holds an LLM in Law and Technology from the India International University of Legal Education and Research (IIULER), Goa. He is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Fashion Law IP Blog, a legal media, research and advisory platform focusing on intellectual property, emerging technologies, and the intersection of law with the fashion and creative industries.

     

References

Abbott, Ryan. 2020. The Reasonable Robot: Artificial Intelligence and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108636795

Craig, C. J., and Ian R. Kerr. 2021. The Death of the AI Author. Ottawa Law Review 52. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3374951

European Commission. 2022. Study on Copyright and New Technologies: Copyright Data Management and Artificial Intelligence. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/study-copyright-and-new-technologies-copyright-data-management-and-artificial-intelligence

European Parliament. 2020. Intellectual Property Rights and Artificial Intelligence. PE 634.452. Brussels: European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_STU(2020)634452

Goodfellow, Ian, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. 2016. Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262035613.001.0001

Guadamuz, Andres. 2017. Artificial Intelligence and Copyright. WIPO Magazine. October 2017. https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2017/05/article_0003.html

Landes, William M., and Richard A. Posner. 2003. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038992

Lemley, Mark A., and Bryan Casey. 2021. Fair Learning. Texas Law Review 99: 743–786. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3528447

Leval, Pierre N. 1990. Toward a Fair Use Standard. Harvard Law Review 103 (5): 1105–1136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341457

OECD. 2019. Artificial Intelligence in Society. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/2a2e2d45-en

Samuelson, Pamela. 2020a. AI Authorship? Communications of the ACM 63 (7): 20–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3404510

Samuelson, Pamela. 2020b. Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Intellectual Property Law and Policy. Stanford Technology Law Review 23: 1–32. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3679997

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). 2020. Revised Issues Paper on Intellectual Property Policy and Artificial Intelligence. WIPO/IP/AI/2/GE/20/1. Geneva: WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/en/wipo_ip_ai_2_ge_20/wipo_ip_ai_2_ge_20_1.pdf

Downloads

Published

14-07-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Gogoi, Aminesh Nayan. 2026. “Generative AI, Copyright Law, and the Future of Creativity: A Call for International Reform”. Trends in Intellectual Property Research 4 (3): 21-26. https://doi.org/10.69971/tipr.4.3.2026.136.