Legal Challenges of Intellectual Property Rights for Quantum Computing

Authors

  • Muhammad Zia-Ul-Haq Office of Research Innovation and Commercialization (ORIC), University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Lahore, Pakistan
  • Ghulam Mujtaba Intellectual Property Organization of Pakistan, NTC Center, G-5/2 G-5, Islamabad, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69971/j6s0x410

Keywords:

Quantum Computing, Patent, Copyright, Industrial Design, Challenges, Technology, Choice

Abstract

Quantum computing is a very multidisciplinary field, a blend of materials science, electronics, electromagnetism, thermodynamics, quantum physics and the corresponding mathematical framework. The study aimed to evaluate the existing scenario of the choice of the intellectual property rights (IPRs) protection mechanisms for quantum computing, choice of best applicable type, and suggesting some key alternative innovation protection mechanisms. The methodology used in this research consists of general scientific and specific legal (historical-legal, formal-legal) methods besides law interpretation and legal modelling. We critically analyzed the norms for IPR protection of quantum computing from the viewpoint of obtaining protection of inventions and increasing the innovation activity in quantum computing. One of the regulatory mechanisms for every disruptive technology is offering it IP protection. Currently quantum computing hardware is protected by patents while software is mostly protected as copyright besides protection by industrial design and trade secret exist as complementary mechanisms for this revolutionary technology. All available approaches were considered, and amendments are suggested in current IPR legislation to correspond to the reality. This interdisciplinary research revealed the uncertain nature of quantum computing and the difficulty in selecting one type of IPR as the best choice. The best way to establish a sufficient IPR mechanism is to acknowledge quantum computing as an emerging technological cocktail, and to sustain the innovation cycle of this technology. The conclusions of this study can be used to overcome the lacunas in existing IPR system for the quantum computing. This research can be used as torchbearer when preparing proposals for making revisions and additions to the existing legislation.

References

Aboy, M., Minssen, T., & Kop, M. “Mapping the patent landscape of quantum technologies: patenting

trends, innovation and policy implications”. IIC-International Review of Intellectual Property and

Competition Law 53, no. 6 (2022): 853-882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01209-3 .

Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2003). “Quantum technology: the second quantum

revolution”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical,

Physical and Engineering Sciences 361, no.1809 (2003):1655-1674.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2003.1227.

Dydenko, I. “Searching claims comprising non-technical features at the European patent office”. World

Patent Information 54, no. S (2018): S44-S50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2017.05.005.

Foss-Solbrekk, K. “Three routes to protecting ai systems and their algorithms under IP law: the good,

the bad and the ugly”. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 16, no. 3 (2021):247-258.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab033.

Harrison, R. “Quantum computing innovations”.

https://blog.shp.law/index.php/2022/01/15/quantum-computing-innovations/ (Accessed 20

December 2023)

Hemel, D. J., & Ouellette, L. L. “Beyond the patents-prizes debate”. Texas Law Review 92, no.2

(2013):303-382. https://texaslawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/HemelOuellette.pdf .

Keempas, T. “A note on artificial intelligence and intellectual property in Sweden and the EU”.

Stockholm IP Law Review 1, no.1 (2020): 154-165. https://www.lawpub.se/artikel/4778.

Kop, M. “Establishing a legal-ethical framework for Quantum Technology”. Yale Journal of Law &

Technology, (2021b). https://yjolt.org/blog/establishing-legal-ethical-framework-quantumtechnology (Accessed 30 December 2023).

Kop, M. “Regulating transformative technology in the quantum age: intellectual property,

standardization & sustainable innovation”. Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments (2020).

https://law.stanford.edu/publications/regulating-transformative-technology-in-the-quantumage-intellectual-property-standardization-sustainable-innovation/(Accessed30 December 2023).

Kop, M., & Brongersma, M. “Integrating bespoke IP regimes for quantum technology into national

security policy”. Stanford University. (2021). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4095763 (Accessed

December 2023).

Kop, M., Aboy, M., & Minssen, T. “Intellectual property in quantum computing and market power: a

theoretical discussion and empirical analysis”. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice

, no.8 (2022): 613-628. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac060.

Kop, M., “Quantum computing and intellectual property law”. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 25, no.3

(2021a): 101-115. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3860456.

Mason, E. “Trends in quantum computing patents”. Quantum Economic development consortium

(2021). https://quantumconsortium.org/blog/trends-in-quantum-computing-patents/ (Accessed

December 2023).

Merchant, P. “International patent insights on quantum computing”. International patent insights on

quantum computing (2023). https://www.marks-clerk.com/insights/articles/internationalpatent-insights-on-quantum-computing/ (Accessed 20 May 2023).

Singh, P. “Role of intellectual property rights in the era of quantum technology”. (2022).

https://www.iiprd.com/role-of-intellectual-property-rights-in-the-era-of-quantum-technology/

(Accessed 30 December 2023).

Sterckx, S., & Cockbain, J. “The patentability of computer programs in Europe: an improved

interpretation of articles 52 (2) and (3) of the European patent convention”. The Journal of World

Intellectual Property 13, no. 3 (2010): 366-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-

2009.00390.x.

Marella, S. T., & Parisa H. S. K. Introduction to quantum computing. In: Quantum Computing and

Communication; Ed.: Zhao, Y. (Rijeka-Croatia, IntechOpen:2022). DOI:

5772/intechopen.94103.

Wadha, V. “Why quantum computing is even more dangerous than artificial intelligence”. (2022).

https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/08/21/quantum-computing-artificial-intelligence-aitechnology-regulation/.

Wilson-Bilik, M. J., Bahar, M., Sand, F. L. A., & Bloomfield, C. “Getting ready for quantum computing:

managing the quantum threat”. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=573f7bfde7b9-4df3-afa3-79807adf56b1 (Accessed 30 December 2023).

Downloads

Published

19-04-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Legal Challenges of Intellectual Property Rights for Quantum Computing. (2024). Trends in Intellectual Property Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.69971/j6s0x410