On patent searching: the case of 3D-bioprinting

Authors

  • Massimo Barbieri Technology Transfer Office, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza L. da vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7409-5861
  • Domenico Golzio Patent Information Expert, Via A. Nazzari 12,64025 Pineto, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69971/tipr.3.2.2025.48

Keywords:

Patents, Patent searches, 3D-bioprinting, international patent classification, WIPO

Abstract

This study offers a commentary on the retrieval of patents related to 3D bioprinting. Patents contain technical information that can’t be retried from other sources. However, it is challenging to obtain this information precisely and comprehensively. A patent search strategy that focuses exclusively on the title and abstract may yield incomplete results, as patent documents possess a distinct intrinsic nature that differentiates them from those found in academic publications. A patent search, limited to the title and abstract, whether in isolation or in combination, may offer only a preliminary, general perspective on a technology and its underlying inventions. For a comprehensive understanding, it is imperative to consider additional elements, such as bibliographic data, including patent classification codes, and claims. The classification symbols are independent of the language used and have the capacity to enhance a patent landscape or patent prior art to a considerable degree.

References

Blokhina, Yu. V., and A. S. Ilin.2021 Use of patent classification in searching for biomedical information. Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemis-try 47: 1225–1230. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1068162021060066

Clarke, Nigel S. 2018. The basics of patent searching World Patent Information 54: S4-S10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2017.02.006

Espacenet Patent Search database, available online at https://worldwide.espacenet.com/ (Accessed on 15 July 2025)

List, Jane. 2015. Editorial: On patent classification. World Patent Information 41: 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2015.04.002

Octimine database, available online at https://app.octimine.com (Accessed on 16 July 2025)

Rodriguez-Salvador, Marisela, Rosa Maria Rio-Belver, and Gaizka Garechana-Anacabe. 2017 Scientometric and patentometric analyses to deter-mine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting. PLoS One 12: e0180375. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180375

Santoni, Silvia, Simone G Gugliandolo, Mattia Sponchioni, Davide Moscatelli, and Bianca M. Colosimo., 2022 3D bioprinting: current status and trends – a guide to the literature and industrial practice. Bio-Design and Manufacturing 5:14-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-021-00165-0

WIPO Standard ST.12/A – General guidelines for the preparation of abstracts of patent documents. https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/standards/docs-en-03-12-a.pdf

WIPO Standard ST.12/B – Guidelines for the preparation of categorized patent abstracts. https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/standards/docs-en-03-12-b.pdf

WIPO standard ST.15 – Guidelines for the wording of titles of inventions in patent documents. https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/standards/docs-en-03-15-01.pdf

Downloads

Published

31-07-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

On patent searching: the case of 3D-bioprinting. (2025). Trends in Intellectual Property Research, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.69971/tipr.3.2.2025.48