Evolving Paradigms of Trade Secret Protection: A Comparative Study of the US, EU, and India

Shruti Nandwana

doi:10.69971/tipr.2.2.2024.32

Authors

Shruti Nandwana Department of Law, Dharmashastra National Law University, Jabalpur; India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69971/tipr.2.2.2024.32

Keywords:

trade secrets, uniform trade secrets act, defend trade secrets act, economic espionage act, TRIPS

Abstract

The protection of trade secrets is integral to commercial practices since the inception of trade itself. This study explores the historical evolution and current legal frameworks governing trade secrets in the United States, European Union, and India. In the United States, trade secret law transitioned from common law torts to codified statutes, culminating in the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (1979) and the Defend Trade Secrets Act (2016). Federal protection is also provided under the Economic Espionage Act (1996). In contrast, the European Union historically lacked uniformity in trade secret protection until the enactment of the EU Trade Secret Directive (2016), which harmonized standards across member states. In India, trade secrets are primarily protected under common law and contractual agreements, with no specific legislation governing their protection. This comparative analysis highlights the need for a robust legal framework for trade secrets protection in India to enhance its compliance with TRIPS obligations.

References

Bone, Robert G. 1998. A new look at trade secret law: Doctrine in search of justification. California Law Review 86: 241-243. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38942G

Bouchenard, Claire. 2015. Trade secrets under French law. Osborne Clarke. https://www.osborneclarke.com/insights/trade-secrets-under-french-law

Cohen, Bret, Mullins Nelson, Carozza Amanda, Levin Mintz. 2018. Recourse for trade secret misappropriation under the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act. https://www.lexisnexis.com/lexis-practice-advisor/the-journal/b/lpa/posts/recourse-for-trade-secret-misappropriation-under-the-federal-defend-trade-secrets-act

Czapracka, Katarzyna A. 2012. Antitrust and trade secrets: The U.S. and the EU approach. Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal 24: 207-216.

Deutch, Miguel. 1997. The property concept of trade secrets in Anglo-American law: An ongoing debate. University of Richmond Law Review 31: 313-369. https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj/vol24/iss2/1

Hull, John. 1998. Stealing secrets: a review of the law commission's consultation paper on the misuse of trade secrets. Intellectual Property Quarterly 4:422-430.

Jager, Melvin F. 1991. Trade secrets law. Clark Boardman Callaghan, USA.

Lemley, Mark A. 2010. The surprising virtues of treating trade secrets as IP rights. Stanford Law Review 61: 311. https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/the-surprising-virtues-of-treating-trade-secrets-as-ip-rights/

Milgrim, Roger M, Bensen Eric E.2001. Milgrim on trade secrets (Vol. 1, § 4.01). Matthew Bender Elite Products, USA.

Mossinghoff, Gerald J, Mason J. Derek, Oblon David A. 1997. The Economic Espionage Act: A new federal regime of trade secret protection. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 79:191-210. https://www.oblon.com/publications/the-economic-espionage-act-a-new-federal-regime-of-trade-secret-protection

Ollier, Peter. 2019. Managing intellectual property: India trade secrets law dubbed absurd. https://www.managingip.com/Article/2023296/India-trade-secrets-law-dubbed-absurd.html?ArticleId=2023296

Paine, Lynn S. 1991. Justification of intellectual property: A comment on Hettinger. Philosophy and Public Affairs 20: 247-263.

Protection of Trade Secrets: Overview of current law and legislation. (2016). In CRS Reports. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R43714.html

Raina, Chandni. 2015. Trade Secret Protection in India: The Policy Debate. Centre for WTO Studies, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, New Delhi, Working Paper CWS/WP/200/22 . https://www.iift.ac.in/iift/docs/report/10.pdf

Robison, T. 1983. The confidence game: An approach to the law about trade secrets. Arizona Law Review 25: 347-383

Samuelson, Pamela.2000. Privacy as intellectual property? Stanford Law Review 52:1125-1173. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229511

Schiller, Arthur A. 1993. Trade Secrets and the Roman Law; The Actio Servi Corrupti. Columbia Law Review 30: 837-845. https://doi.org/10.2307/1115082