The Crossroad between Intellectual Property and Clinical Trials: Balancing Incentives for Innovation with Access to Healthcare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69971/tipr.1.2.2023.16Keywords:
Intellectual Property Rights, clinical trials , health , pharmaceutical, licensing, patentsAbstract
The interplay between intellectual property rights (IPRs) and clinical trials presents a complex challenge in the realm of healthcare innovation. This paper examines the critical role of IPRs, particularly patents, in incentivizing pharmaceutical research and development while simultaneously addressing their implications for access to essential medicines, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We explore the phases of clinical trials that underpin medical advancements and highlight the significant financial and temporal investments required for drug development. The discussion also delves into the tensions created by monopolistic pricing, data exclusivity, and evergreening practices that hinder equitable access to healthcare. Through a review of international agreements like the TRIPS Agreement and case studies on HIV/AIDS, hepatitis C treatments, and COVID-19 vaccines, we illustrate the urgent need for policy reforms and alternative incentive models, including prize funds, patent pools, and tiered pricing strategies. Our findings underscore the necessity for a balanced approach that fosters innovation while ensuring that life-saving medications are accessible to all populations. Ultimately, this paper calls for collaborative efforts among governments, international organizations, and the private sector to create an equitable healthcare landscape that prioritizes public health needs without stifling innovation.
References
Abbott, Frederick M. 2002. The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: Lighting a dark corner at the WTO. Journal of International Economic Law5: 469-505. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1493725
Baker, Brook K. 2008. Processes and issues for improving access to medicines: Willingness and ability to utilize TRIPS flexibilities in non-producing countries. https://www.iprsonline.org/resources/docs/Baker_TRIPS_Flex.pdf
Correa, Carlos Maria. 2000. Intellectual property rights, the WTO, and developing countries: The TRIPS Agreement and policy options. Zed Books,New York: USA.Abbott, Frederick M. 2002. The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and public health: lighting a dark corner at the WTO. Journal of International Economic Law5: 469-505. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1493725.
Baker, Brook K. 2008. Processes and issues for improving access to medicines: willingness and ability to utilize TRIPS flexibilities in non-producing countries. https://www.iprsonline.org/resources/docs/Baker_TRIPS_Flex.pdf.
Correa, Carlos Maria. 2000. Intellectual property rights, the WTO, and developing countries: The TRIPS Agreement and policy options. Zed Books, New York: USA.
Ford, Nathan, Wilson David, Bunjumnong Onanong, Schoen-Angerer Tido von. 2004. The role of civil society in protecting public health over commercial interests: lessons from Thailand. The Lancet 363: 560-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15545-1 .
Hettinger, Edwin C. 1989. Justifying intellectual property rights. Philosophy & Public Affairs 18:31-52.
Hoen, Erwin T. 2021. A critical review of the TRIPS Waiver proposal for COVID-19 vaccines. Global Health Journal 3: 1-9.
Hubbard, Tim, Love James. 2004. A new trade framework for global healthcare R&D. PLoS Biology 2: e52. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020052 .
Jung, Youn, Kwon Soonman.2015. The effects of intellectual property rights on access to medicines and catastrophic expenditure. International Journal of Health Services 17: 295-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731415584560 .
Kapczynski, Am., Chaifetz Samantha, Benkler Yochai, Zachary Katz. Y. 2012. Addressing global health inequities: An open licensing approach for university innovations. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 24: 947-977. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1323527 .
Kesselheim, Aaron S, Avorn Jerry, Sarpatwari Ameet. 2007. The high cost of prescription drugs in the United States: origins and prospects for reform. Journal of American Medical Association 316: 858-871. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.11237 .
Light, Donald W, Lexchin Joel R. 2012. Pharmaceutical R&D—what do we get for all that money? British Medical Journal 344: e4348. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4348 .
Love, James. 2007. Measures to enhance access to medical technologies, and new methods of stimulating innovation in medicines. Health Affairs 26: 792-802.
Maggiolino, M. 2011. Pharmaceutical patents: overprotection's detrimental effects on market structure and innovation. Journal of Law and Health 24: 85-108.
Morten, Chris, Moss Alex. 2020. Could a patent get in between you and a COVID-19 test? Yes. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/may/20/coronavirus-patents-testing-us-senate .
Outterson, Kevin. 2005. The legal ecology of resistance: The role of patent law in microbial resistance. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33: 588-596.
Outterson, Kevin.2009. The legal ecology of resistance: the role of antibiotic resistance in pharmaceutical innovation. Cardozo Law Review 09-48. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1492150 .
Reichman, Jerome H. 2009. Compulsory licensing of patented pharmaceutical inventions: Evaluating the options. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37: 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1748-720X.2009.00369.x.
Royle, Jennifer K, Hughes Andrew, Stephenson Laura, Landers Dónal 2021. Technology clinical trials: turning innovation into patient benefit. Digit Health 30:7:20552076. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076211012131 .
Sell, Susan K. 2003. Private power, public law: The globalization of intellectual property rights. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.